Archive for March, 2010

Is Google’s open-source advocacy a patent-busting

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Google contributes to open source for a variety of reasons, not the least reason being that it recognizes open source is an efficient way to create community around its products. But perhaps Google has this more subtle, and sophisticated, reason as well?

This is incredibly insightful on Prentice’s part, and amazingly shrewd if, in fact, Google is playing this game. It takes open-source advocacy to an entirely new, Sun T’zu-esque plane.

If true, The Register’s question–”Is Google spending $106.5m to open source a codec?”–calls up a different response than the author of that article gives. Maybe $106 million is cheap compared to the cost of getting hit with video compression patent suits (from Microsoft, Apple, and others), if Google open source’s On2’s video compression codecs.

Brilliant.

Brian Prentice, a research vice president with Gartner’s Emerging Trends and Technologies Group, speculates that it just might be. Google has been actively developing open-source alternatives to leading proprietary products, like Google Wave to compete with Microsoft Outlook and SharePoint. As Prentice indicates, Google has also been publicly advocating passage of the Patent Reform Act of 2009, which might have a lot to do with its open-source strategy.

Open source means different things to different people. It can be a software development methodology, a distribution technique, or a marketing gimmick. Could it also be a way to minimize patent infringement damages?

Here’s why.

The proposed legislation alters the way damages are calculated in infringement suits to be “calculated as the price of licensing a ’similar non-infringing substitute in the relative market.’” Now if that alternative is a free, open-source piece of software, then damages drop to zero, as Prentice notes:

Follow me on Twitter @mjasay.

Does that mean that free open source products can now be considered substitutes in a relative market? I’ve been trying to play the scenarios out in my head. If Google Wave, hypothetically, infringes a patent that IBM holds and they’re found guilty of doing so, could they simply claim that the relative market value is zero because there are existing free OSS mail and IM solutions? Once Google Wave is shipping, can other organizations infringe on patents Microsoft holds relative to Exchange comfortable in the knowledge that Wave creates a zero dollar relative market value for collaboration?

Martin Fink of Hewlett-Packard first started talking about the value of using open source to commoditize a competitor’s core offering through open source back in his 2002 book “The Business and Economics of Open Source.” But Prentice’s idea takes Fink’s argument and runs with it…at Usain Bolt speeds.

My so-called paperless life

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Many folks have already moved their music collections to digital form. When was the last time you needed those CDs? The CD sound fidelity is higher than what you’ll get with MP3–but only if you actually listen to the CD.

And of course going paperless has obvious tree-preservation benefits.

I was surprised how far along I already was. For example, I started photographing my son’s artwork long ago and sharing it through a Flickr group, figuring there was no way I could keep all the real versions I wanted. I give his works the “Levi art” tag for easier location later. These aren’t high-end drum scans or anything–I just put the paper in good light and snap a photo.

Another good place to start is photography. Your new photos are most likely digital, but your old photos are most likely hidden away.

But here’s where things get complicated. I love history, I’ve accumulated plenty of items that, although mundane at the time of their creation, accumulated some historic or sentimental value. The guest book entries (Thomas A. Edison!) at Hermit Creek Camp in the Grand Canyon where my great-grandfather worked, for example, or my grandfather’s Depression-era daily expense log.

When I asked two of my institutions, E*Trade Financial and Vanguard Group, why they couldn’t just e-mail me my statements, both said it’s because of security. Vanguard is aware of PDF encryption technologies, “but we can’t be sure that our shareholders will be able to support working with it on their computers,” and the company also has to worry about shared access to a single e-mail account, Vanguard spokeswoman Linda Wolohan said.

The technology for digitizing what can be digitized is maturing. Serious people get scanners with sheet-feed scanners for bulk digitization, but I decided to just go digital from now on. As the years go by, I’ll gradually cull the older paper documents.

Moving many heavy boxes of books just lent more impetus to my recent Amazon Kindle-initiated e-book revelation. We won’t get rid of all our books, but 95 percent sounds about right.

My animal brain can latch onto something better when it’s accompanied by the texture of paper or the smell of crayon. Someday, perhaps, art museums will feature large electronic displays of paintings, but there’s something extra with the original touched by the artist’s paintbrush than with a mere copy, no matter high the fidelity.

1. Go for it

You can get started without going whole hog. Pick a corner of your life and expand from there at a pace that you’re comfortable with.

Starting small lets you sort out your preferences and problems before you scrap your analog life. Obviously you should be careful with what you throw away–how many years back can the Internal Revenue Service audit your taxes?

My banks and investment institutions have been needling me to go paperless already for years, so that’s a good spot to start. I set up a subfolders on my computer for saving each institution’s statements after download. If you’re nervous, you can print out copies.

So why don’t they just send me PDFs by e-mail? The PDF standard includes encryption, and Adobe digital signature technology that can assure a document hasn’t been tampered with.

Of course stuff can be useful. But because the value of paper documents often is just information, digital versions can be just as good. I reduced four drawers in a filing cabinet to one, and if all goes according to plan, I’ll eventually be rid of one ugly piece of furniture altogether.

What led to this situation? Some people have gone paperless with evangelical fervor, but I’m just trying to pare down the amount of paper cluttering my life. Call it going paper-lite.

5. Save what truly has value

It took me two whole days to cull reams of documents from my filing cabinet, but it was well worth the effort. The hardest decisions were for documents that weren’t obviously essential or disposable, and of course most fell into that intermediate category.

Finally, there are specific online services that are useful for making some kinds of data much more easily accessible. You can store a JPEG of your passport at Flickr, handy if it’s stolen while you’re traveling, or a PDF of your tax forms at Google Docs.

I concluded that I probably needed 1 percent of my documents 99 percent of the time and 99 percent of them 1 percent of the time. With physical documents, it’s hard to speculate about which of the nearly useless documents might in fact become useful or even essential some day.

The wave of the future are online services such as Mozy, Backblaze and Carbonite. If you have hundreds of gigabytes of photo files, as I do, expect to saturate your home Internet connection for a very long time.

I expected problems from my attempt to rid myself of the paper in my life. What I didn’t expect was this complication from my wailing 4-year-old son, Levi:

The big question for me is how close electronic documents will come to holding the same value as their physical counterparts.

With the most important documents, such as birth certificates, I just added digital versions and kept the original paper copies.

But there’s always some risk that your account will be breached or that some technical error at the hosting site will lead to inadvertent overshare, so think carefully about the risks as well as the rewards.

Now I’ve also begun shucking old bank statements, scanning photos, and culling memorabilia. Here are five things I learned on the way.

E*Trade and Vanguard also keep back records–all of them in the case of E*Trade, and back through 2006 for Vanguard. I still like the idea of having my own copies, though.

In short, some physical objects have value that doesn’t easily transfer to the bits of their electronic representation. There’s a great divide between the physical and the virtual.

With digital documents, the penalty for being a packrat is much lower. Of course, finding that necessary document amid the e-clutter could be difficult. But I’m hopeful that in the long run desktop search will make it easier to locate what I need even if I don’t invest a lot of effort in file organization or tagging.

Even though he raised that question in a half-asleep moment in the middle of the night last week, Levi’s anxiety illustrated one big complication about the idea of going paperless.

“We’re very keen on the idea of banks, institutions, and utilities moving back to a more active delivery of a statement,” said John Harris, Adobe’s product manager, electronic signatures and security alliances. “The technologies are there and have been there for some time.”

2. PDF is your friend

Adobe Systems did us all a favor when it invented Portable Document Format and did us another when it handed it over to the ISO for standardization so everything from Apple Preview to Google Docs can make use of them. I’ve had my complaints with the Adobe Reader software, but overall, PDF’s ability to encapsulate graphics and text makes it ideal for the paperless era.

There are a variety of methods, and I recommend more than one. I start with periodic backups on a USB hard drive. For a smaller number of very important documents, burning CDs or DVDs is a good idea; periodically exchanging yours with your friends’ gives some protection against disasters such as theft, fire, and flood.

Based on reviews and some recommendations from friends, I sent a giant batch of photos off to ScanCafe to be turned into JPEGs–they scan slides, negatives, and prints for 29 cents apiece, including basic correction for color and scratches, and you can reject up to half the shots without paying.

Getting rid of reams of documents gave me a feeling of lightness and inspired me to get rid of a lot more–that second-rate spatula, books I’ll never reread, those margarita glasses we never used. Do first-world denizens need to have so much stuff?

For the really special stuff, I’m therefore keeping the physical incarnations. So, Levi, rest easy.

I never had much use for Adobe Acrobat software until wrestling with the oceans of paperwork involved with buying and selling homes. I couldn’t go totally paperless, since physical documents had to be signed, but often I could photograph and crop the documents, use Acrobat to package them into PDFs, and e-mail them on their way.

The formal effort began with an attempt to buy a new house. When we refinanced our mortgage in 2003, the lender insisted on actual physical documents from the actual bank–no printouts of statements downloaded from the bank’s Web site, thank you very much. But in 2009, lenders were happy with e-mailed documents in electronic PDF form.

(Credit:
Levi Konrad-Shankland)

My son's drawing, 'A Truck Dreaming of Another Truck,' now exists only as a digital photo.

4. Back up your data

You’ve heard it before, and now you’re going to hear it again: keep your data safe. The farther down the paperless road you go, the more important that advice gets.

They all send e-mail notifications of new statements, but all this downloading grunt work is a big hassle compared to the pre-paperless days when these statements would arrive in the mail with no effort on my behalf.

PDF is the preferred format for bank statements, too. Here, alas, is one of my biggest beefs: the monthly process of retrieving statements from the three banks, two mutual fund companies, and other financial institutions I deal with for 401k, 529, and IRA accounts.

I’d been hoarding statements in an overstuffed, immovable filing cabinet in part because of the painful memory of paying a bank to reissue one missing statement. Freed from that constraint–and facing the imminent necessity to actually move that filing cabinet to a new home–meant the time had come to go digital.

It was cumbersome, but it beat buying a fax machine, and the documents were now stored electronically on my computer.

3. Physical stuff has a downside, too

Freeing yourself from paper is liberating, even if you’re not moving.

“Daddy, why did you recycle all my pictures?”

Fallout creator gets sued for alleged infringement

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

If you want to check out Fallout Trilogy, click here.

If the court decides in favor of Bethesda, the MMO project would be scrapped, leaving Interplay with no Fallout games.

Interplay could not be immediately reached for comment.

Back in 2007, Interplay signed over to Bethesda the rights to the Fallout game franchise for $5.75 million. That agreement required Interplay to provide Bethesda with packaging and promotional material prior to the release of any Fallout game that Interplay developed.

According to court documents that Bethesda filed last week in U.S. District Court in Maryland, Interplay did not seek its approval of the package’s promotional material. The court documents–reported by game site Gamasutra–allege that the release of the Fallout Trilogy could confuse customers. Bethesda cites Interplay’s Fallout Trilogy and its own Fallout 3 as an example of such confusion. The company also objects to the use of the term “Trilogy,” saying the franchise is not a trilogy.

After Bethesda’s successful Fallout 3 launch, Interplay saw the opportunity to release the Fallout games it had developed–Fallout 1, Fallout 2, and Fallout Tactics–in a package called the Fallout Trilogy.

Fallout MMO is Interplay’s last best chance to stay relevant in the Fallout world. If it lost the possibility of ever creating a Fallout game again, Interplay could effectively be left out of its development in perpetuity.

Fallout, a role-playing game set in post-nuclear apocalypse, is at the center of a legal controversy.

As part of that trademark agreement, Bethesda allows Interplay to develop a massively multiple online (MMO) game under the Fallout banner. Interplay was apparently supposed to be in full-scale development by April 2009 and finding its own funding sources. Bethesda alleges that Interplay is in “breach of contract” for not ramping up its development efforts.

Bethesda Softworks, the current rights holder for Fallout, has sued franchise creator Interplay for alleged trademark infringement.

Bethesda is seeking an injunction on Interplay’s sale of the Fallout Trilogy. According to court documents, Bethesda even wants to terminate a trademark agreement with Interplay.

Bethesda also accuses Interplay of other contract infractions. The company claims Interplay is in breach because it signed digital distribution rights on its Fallout titles with GameTap, Steam, and other services.

(Credit:
Bethesda Softworks)

Podcast Twitter attacker had Georgia in mind

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Elinor Mills

The podcast runs 4 minutes and 53 seconds.

(Credit:
CNET)

Listen now:

Download today’s podcast

CNET security and privacy reporter Elinor Mills, who has been reporting on the Twitter, Facebook, and Google denial of service attacks since early Thursday morning, interviewed a Facebook executive who told her that the attacks appeared not to be aimed at Twitter or Facebook but toward an individual person who blogs about independence of a breakaway region of Georgia. But even though it was aimed at one person, the sheer size of the attack was enough to bring down Twitter and impact Facebook.

Facebook buys FriendFeed Is this a big deal

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

This would also be consistent with Facebook’s minimal past acquisition history: the company bought little-known start-up Parakey two years ago with the primary objective of getting its founders, the creators of the Firefox browser, on board. It’s also well-known that Facebook tried hard to acquire Twitter–which would’ve been a far more significant acquisition than FriendFeed–and was turned down. (Well, there was also ConnectU, whose assets Facebook acquired pretty much just to get that pesky lawsuit off the table.)

“As we spent time with Mark (Zuckerberg) and his leadership team, we were impressed by the open, creative culture they’ve built, and their desire to have us contribute to it,” FriendFeed co-founder Paul Buchheit, another ex-Googler who was instrumental in building Gmail, “It was immediately obvious to us how passionate Facebook’s engineers are about creating simple, groundbreaking ways for people to share, and we are extremely excited to join such a like-minded group.”

TechCrunch reported the news on Monday, a matter of minutes before Facebook confirmed the acquisition.

FriendFeed earned praise from prominent voices in Silicon Valley–most notably Robert Scoble–but its aim to aggregate all of a user’s social-networking activity feeds in one place didn’t catch on with the mainstream. But Facebook eventually began to mimic the FriendFeed model through upgrades to its central “news feed” feature, letting members pull in select third-party updates.

“Since I first tried FriendFeed, I’ve admired their team for creating such a simple and elegant service for people to share information,” Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in the statement. “As this shows, our culture continues to make Facebook a place where the best engineers come to build things quickly that lots of people will use.”

Bret Taylor said that FriendFeed wasn’t shopping itself around. “We weren’t up for sale. We had a healthy amount of financing and a really efficient company,” he told CNET News. “As we noticed our products were really converging in terms of product vision, we started having casual conversations with Facebook.”

Taylor elaborated more to CNET News later on Monday: “Anything that we would do would be more of a transition, not shutting down. I think our users have invested in our product by putting their data in it, sharing it with their friends…We absolutely wouldn’t shut (FriendFeed) down.”

“Facebook and FriendFeed share a common vision of giving people tools to share and connect with their friends,” FriendFeed co-founder Bret Taylor said in a release. “We can’t wait to join the team and bring many of the innovations we’ve developed at FriendFeed to Facebook’s 250 million users around the world.”

But Facebook director of product Christopher Cox said to CNET News later, “I wouldn’t call it a talent acquisition.” He elaborated, “We really have a vision that’s focusing on Facebook being not just a destination but being a service…We think FriendFeed’s been focused on how that’s going to work in an open way, and that’s something we’re excited about, not just the people but the product they’ve built.”

More to come…last updated at 2:04 p.m. PDT.

Surprise! Facebook has acquired FriendFeed, a Bay Area-based social-network feed aggregation start-up.

It’s not clear what will happen to the FriendFeed service, because it sure sounds like Facebook is eager to get its team onto the engineering fast track. “FriendFeed.com will continue to operate normally for the time being,” a post by Taylor on the FriendFeed blog read. “We’re still figuring out our longer-term plans for the product with the Facebook team.”

Yup.

I’m going to go out on a limb and say it: This is not as ridiculously huge of a deal as the Silicon Valley hype machine is going to have you believe.

The release from Facebook repeatedly hinted that this is about talent more than product.

Basically, FriendFeed has been coasting on a lot of hype and not a lot of mainstream recognition, and it’s not a bit surprising that it would be seeking an exit at this point. Facebook acquired it for its talent; prior to FriendFeed, Taylor was part of the team that helped launch Google Maps. So the real story here is that Facebook made the rather expensive hire (and we don’t know the terms of the deal) of some very talented former Googlers. FriendFeed’s co-founders “will hold senior roles on Facebook’s engineering and product teams,” according to the release, and the rest of the company’s 12 employees will also join Facebook.

Can autism really be detected by voice alone

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

The Lena Foundation, whose new autism-screening tool hit the market in September, claims that parents who use the Lena System are now able to determine with 91 percent accuracy whether their child is developing normally, has autism, or has unassociated language delays.

The home kit, which includes a digital audio recorder, an outfit to hold the recorder, and a questionnaire about the child’s development thus far, costs $699. (The one-time language and autism screen, on the other hand, is $200.) The foundation, which develops technology for the screening of several types of language delays and disorders, says the kit works for children as young as 24 months.

“Roughly speaking, autistic children vocalize differently from other children,” Dongxin Xu, manager of software and language engineering at the Lena Foundation, tells MIT’s Technology Review.

The 91 percent accuracy is high, and while Lena researchers continue to fine-tune their software to push that rate even higher, I remain somewhat skeptical that voice alone can determine whether a child is autistic. It is often suggested that Einstein didn’t speak until he was at least 3, if not 4 or 5; I have to wonder how a 16-hour recording of Einstein at 24 months would be interpreted by Lena software.

(Credit:
Lena Foundation)

According to Jeffrey Richards, a statistician and database technician for the Lena Foundation, the software first categorizes the 16-hour audio stream into sound types, such as child, parent, or television. The child clips are then further dissected, and analyzed for the phonological composition of each sound, as well as how it is clustered and paired. The resulting data is then compared with the data compiled on children who are considered normal, autistic, or delayed.

Analyzing a child’s vocal patterns to screen for autism isn’t new. The three factors that seem to set the Lena System apart from traditional screening methods are portability (the recording device is small); amount of data (16-hour recordings); and the software Lena uses to analyze the recordings parents mail in dutifully each month.

The Lena System, a home device that records 16 hours of audio from a toddler's shirt pocket, appears to predict autism in children as young as 24 months with 91 percent accuracy.

Netflix adds ‘Lost,’ other ABC shows to streaming

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

As far as I’m concerned, this seems like another feather in the cap for Netflix. These sort of serialized dramas are perfect fodder for sequential online viewing. (The final season of “Lost” starts early in 2010, and Netflix subscribers who want to catch up–or start from scratch–can do so at no extra charge.) What’s interesting to me is that ABC’s making this move, which could potentially lower demand for sales of the same episodes on DVD and iTunes. One wonders how Disney board member Steve Jobs feels about it.

What do you think: Are you excited to see these ABC shows hitting Netflix, or does it just highlight some favorite shows of yours that still remain unavailable?

Several of ABC’s top shows will soon be available to watch via Netflix’s “Watch Instantly” online streaming service. The first four seasons of “Lost” are already available, and they’ll be joined in September by “Desperate Housewives” (seasons four and five), “Grey’s Anatomy” (season five), and “Legend of the Seeker” (seasons one and two). The deal builds on an earlier agreement to make Disney Channel content available on Netflix (ABC is a division of Disney.)

Four seasons of "Lost" are already available.

(Credit:
Netflix/screenshot by John P. Falcone)

While most of these programs are already available for viewing online on ABC’s Web site, the Netflix deal allows them to be watched on TV screens via a large and growing number of Netflix-compatible home video devices, including many Blu-ray players and home theater systems, some Internet-enabled TVs, the Xbox 360, and the $99 Roku Digital Media Player. The ABC content joins programs from rival networks, including Fox, NBC, and CBS, that have long been available on Netflix. (Disclosure: CNET is a division of CBS Interactive.) The online video streaming–available at no extra charge for Netflix subscribers on the $9 per month or higher rental tier–currently offers approximately 12,000 movies and TV shows.

Report Comcast in talks with NBC Universal

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Individual TV channels have been putting their own TV content online for consumers to access for some time. This initially troubled cable operators such as Comcast; they saw the free delivery of video content for which they pay a hefty price as a threat to their business.

Cable giant Comcast is reportedly in talks to gain a controlling stake in General Electric’s NBC Universal, in a deal that would help shape Comcast’s online-content strategy and help NBC Universal keep pace amid the shifting market.

This isn’t the first time Comcast has gone looking for a big media company. Five years ago, the company tried to acquire Walt Disney for about $66 billion. In the years since that failed attempt, the media and video distribution landscape has changed dramatically.

Comcast, too, is starting to embrace online video, teaming up with media conglomerate Time Warner earlier this year to test a new service offered by Comcast called On Demand Online. The service allows Comcast cable customers to access some of Time Warner’s most popular TV shows from its TNT and TBS networks at no additional charge. Its plan is to provide TV networks and movie studios a secure way to distribute their movies and TV shows to a wider audience via the Internet.

NBC and News Corp., the owner of Fox, have made a splash with online service Hulu, which offers TV shows and some movies on demand. Other media conglomerates, including CNET News publisher CBS, have made similar moves.

Television networks are struggling to keep advertising revenues up, and movie studios are under pressure to prevent digital piracy from eating into their profits. Meanwhile, Comcast, which is facing more competition from phone companies and satellite providers in its TV business, is also trying to figure out how best to use the Internet to deliver video content.

Combined, the new jointly owned media company would own more than two dozen TV networks, including NBC, along with several cable stations, such as USA Network. Comcast already operates some of its own cable networks, such as E!, the Style Network, and G4. The new joint venture would also own NBC Universal studios, plus 10 local NBC TV affiliates in cities such as New York and San Diego.

According to a Wall Street Journal report, Comcast is hoping to form a privately held joint venture that would include NBC’s media content. Comcast would control the venture with a 51 percent stake, and GE would own 49 percent of the new company.

The Wall Street Journal said that talks between Comcast and GE could still fall apart. Comcast is looking to pay as little as it can up-front. And there is an issue about what to do with Vivendi, which has a 20 percent stake in NBC Universal.

Easiest screencasts ever Screenr

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

I like Screenr a lot. Here’s a sample:

Which leaves the free version of Screenr as a little marketing expense. (A paid version may follow, with options for branding, longer recording times, and so on.) Lest you worry about the company shutting down the non-revenue-generating free product (see “URL shortener Trim gets cut off”), take some comfort in what Schwartz says on the topic: “This is really cheap for us. We’re hosted on the Rackspace cloud, and the cost for doing this is like two orders of magnitude less than it was when we looked at this two years ago. It would cost more as a marketing fiasco to shut this down than it would to keep it running.” Take that as you wish, but at least the company behind this cool free service seems to be on solid footing.

The just-launched Screenr product isn’t the only easy Web-friendly screencast tool out there, but among the competing products I’ve tried, including ScreenJelly and Jing, it is the best option for creating screencasts fast and getting them posted immediately. All you do is let the Java-powered recording app load from the Screenr Web page and hit a button to record a screencast of up to five minutes.

But where’s the business?
Screenr is a production of the New York company Articulate, which makes e-learning tools, primarily for corporations. CEO Adam Schwartz told me Articulate has about 20,000 paying customers for its software and services. Screenr, he said, is a first step in the company’s creation of a new group of e-learning products, which he compares to the popular software-based screencast products from Camtasia. But with Artculate’s focus on education, the tools will be “more about interactivity, branching, learning, and simulation.” His fully developed screencast tools will have the capabilities for grading and quizzing, and will be integrated into more fully formed educational suites.

Screenr’s special power is its slick Twitter integration. As with TwitPic and TwitVid, once the service collects your media, it posts it on a page for you and can send a description and a link out directly from your Twitter account. The screencasts can also be embedded on any Web page.

There’s no editing option or other fancy features like picture-in-picture recording. If you want to go that route, look at apps like Camtasia for Windows, or ScreenFlow on the Mac. However, you can set the size of your image-recording window before you start recording, to make sure you don’t include distracting interface elements in your presentation.

Symantec identifies ‘Dirtiest Web Sites of Summer’

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Podcast: Larry speaks with Symantec’s director of security response, Gerry Egan (8:43)

Symantec's Safe Web rates sites for safety

Symantec is out with its “Dirtiest Web Sites of Summer 2009,” which it’s calling “the worst of the worst” when it comes to malware threats.

The security vendor says that “48 percent of the Dirtiest Web Sites are, well, dirty–sites that feature adult content.” That means that more than half the sites cover a wide range of other categories including legal services, catering, figure skating, and electronics shopping, according to the report.

On average, sites on the dirtiest list have 18,000 threats per site, but 40 of the sites have in excess of 20,000 threats. One site that appears to offer restaurant catering services has 23,414 computer threats

Symantec has identified these dirty sites as part of the ongoing analysis it does for its Norton Safe Web product. Safe Web includes a free Web site that anyone can use to see if a site is known to have malware. In addition, Symantec’s security products now come with a plug-ins that works with a browser to look over your shoulder while you’re surfing or searching to warn you before visiting a site known to contain malware.

Listen now:

Download today’s podcast

There are a number of dastardly payloads associated with the type of malware delivered through these sites including turning your machine into a “spambot” that sends junk e-mail to other people. Such programs can also hijack your computer to be part of a “botnet” to carry out attacks on other systems such as the recent denial-of-service attack that brought down Twitter earlier this month.

The Web, said Egan “has become the primary delivery vehicle for malware.” One method for infection is “drive by downloads,” which can exploit a vulnerability in your browser or operating system by “leveraging little security holes” and injecting code into your machine simply by virtue of your visiting the site. Another route to infections is social engineering where someone tricks a user into installing a malicious application that can masquerade as a plug-in to play media or even a fake security program that claims to help you find and remove malware. Instead it installs malware on your machine.

(Credit: Symantec)

“The number of web attacks is off the charts because it’s the easiest path into a consumer’s machine” said Gerry Egan, Symantec’s director of security response.

TrendMicro Internet Security has a feature that warns you if you are about to visit a site that “may put your security at risk” and McAfee offers a service called McAfee Site Advisor that includes a free plug-in for Firefox and Internet Explorer that warns you about potentially dangerous sites that show up in search results.